Legal Opinion

State v. Mikulic

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1996No. 70269PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In this delayed appeal, defendant Andrew Mikulic challenges his convictions on two counts of robbery. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

On December 9, 1993, defendant was indicted for two counts of robbery with violence specifications and one count of felonious assault with two violence specifications. Defendant pleaded not guilty, and counsel was assigned to represent him. The record next indicates that the state and defense counsel entered into plea negotiations, and on December 17, 1993, the court held the following…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. WolonsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. SwiftOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. GibsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Atchley, Unpublished Decision (3-15-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State v. McRaeOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. State v. MullinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. State v. ShawOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. CrookshanksOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API