State v. Wolons
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
We first must determine whether the defendant waived his right to appeal the denial of his request that the jury be instructed on the law of intoxication. We are asked to extend to criminal cases our holding in Presley v. Norwood (1973), 36 Ohio St. 2d 29, 65 O.O. 2d 129, 303 N.E. 2d 81.
In Presley we considered Civ. R. 51(A), which contains language almost identical to Crim. R. 30(A). Under both rules, a party “may not assign as error the giving or failure to give any instruction [‘instructions,’ in Crim. R. 30(A)] unless he objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Presley v. City of NorwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. HipkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by311 opinions
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. WillifordOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. GoffOhio Supreme Court · 1998
306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.