Legal Opinion

Maher-App v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 29, 1968No. C.D. 3429PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

The protests here involved, which have been consolidated for purposes of trial, place in issue the tariff classification of certain imported merchandise, consisting of 5 or 8 pound balls of henequen or sisal twine, which was invoiced as binder twine. The collector of customs at the port of entry applied the provision for cords and twines in paragraph 1005 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, *472T.D. 51802, and, accordingly, assessed duty upon these importations at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pacific Guano & Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Independent Cordage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  3. Vales v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  4. Bob Stone Cordage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Winne v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API