Legal Opinion

Independent Cordage Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 10, 1939No. C. D. 223PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kincheloe, Judge:

Tbe merchandise here in issue consists of 300 bales of single ply sisal twine imported in balls weighing 5 pounds, packed 10 balls to the bale, and measuring not exceeding 750 feet to the pound. It was classified and assessed for duty by the collector at the rate of 40 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1005 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, which so far as pertinent, reads as follows:

Par. 1005 (b). Cords and twines * * * tarred or untarred, single or plied, wholly or in chief value of * * * sisal * * * or other hard fiber, 40 per centum ad valorem.

While the original protest…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maher-App & Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. Vales v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  3. Geo Wm. Rueff, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Maher-App v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Maher-App & Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API