Legal Opinion

Bob Stone Cordage Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 12, 1962No. C.D. 2331PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Kao, Judge:

In the cases listed in the schedule of protests, attached to this decision and made a part hereof, which have been consolidated for purposes of trial, plaintiffs contest the assessment of duty at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem on certain imported twine, composed of Mexican sisal. The assessment was made by the collector of customs at the port of entry, by virtue of the provisions of paragraph 1005 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, for—

Cords and twines (whether or not composed of three or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pacific Guano & Fertilizer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maher-App v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API