Legal Opinion

Iodence v. City of Alliance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 2005No. S-03-528PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

NATURE OF CASE

Carol Louise Iodence (Iodence) was injured when the vehicle she was driving struck a tree stump on property owned by the City of Alliance, Nebraska. The issue presented in this case is whether the city is immune from liability under the Recreation Liability Act (RLA), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§37-729 to 37-736 (Reissue 2004). We hold that it was not immune because Iodence did not enter or use the city’s land for “recreational purposes,” as that term is defined by § 37-729(3).

BACKGROUND

On October 14, 1999, Iodence traveled to the Alliance softball complex to watch her son play a YMCA…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Watson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Fetherolf v. State, Dept. of Natural ResourcesOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. LiCause v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bailey v. City of North PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Dworak v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNebraska Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Leet v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Bronsen v. Dawes CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Pereira v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  4. MacFarlane v. Sarpy Cty. Sch. Dist. 77-0037Nebraska Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Bronsen v. Dawes CountyNebraska Court of Appeals · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API