Legal Opinion

Bronsen v. Dawes County

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 2005No. A-04-237PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Carolyn Bronsen filed a claim in the district court for Dawes County, Nebraska, against Dawes County (the County) and Fur Trade Days, Inc. (FTD), seeking damages for injuries she sustained after tripping and falling in a depression or hole in the lawn of the Dawes County courthouse while attending the Fur Trade Days celebration in Chadron, Nebraska. The district court granted motions for summary judgment filed by the County and FTD, finding that both the County and FTD were immune from liability pursuant to the Nebraska Recreational Liability Act (RLA), Neb. Rev.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Heins v. Webster CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Garreans Ex Rel. Garreans v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Watson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. McIntosh Ex Rel. McIntosh v. Omaha Public SchoolsNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Livingston v. Metropolitan Utilities DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bronsen v. Dawes CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API