Legal Opinion
Leet v. City of Minot
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 13, 2006No. 20060011PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Charles Leet and Janet Leet (“Leets”) appealed from a summary judgment dismissing their complaint against the City of Minot and awarding costs and disbursements to Minot. Because we conclude the recreational use immunity statutes do not bar the Leets’ claims, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] In May 2002, while Charles Leet was working at the Minot Auditorium, he was injured when a curtain divider system fell and a pipe struck him on the head. The auditorium is owned, operated, and maintained by Minot, and city employees had set up the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Allied Chemical Corporation v. Jack MacKay D/B/A MacKay Farms Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Bulman v. Hulstrand Construction Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- M.M. v. Fargo Public School District No. 1North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Belfield v. KilkennyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Great Western Bank v. Willmar Poultry Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Kappenman v. KlipfelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Kambeitz v. Acuity Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.