Legal Opinion

Bronsen v. Dawes County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2006No. S-04-237PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHendry, C.J.

NATURE OF CASE

Appellant, Carolyn Bronsen, sustained personal injuries when she stepped into a hole or depression in the Dawes County, Nebraska, courthouse lawn. Bronsen was attending a historical celebration organized by Fur Trade Days, Inc. (FTD), a Nebraska not-for-profit organization. After complying with the notification requirements of Nebraska’s Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act (PSTCA), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 13-901 to 13-926 (Reissue 1997 & Cum. Supp. 2002), Bronsen filed a negligence action against Dawes County and FTD.

In response to defendants’ motions for summary judgment, the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Monteville v. Terrebonne Par. Con. Gov'tSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  5. Stonehill College v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Moss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  3. M.M. v. Fargo Public School District No. 1North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Edwards v. Hy-VeeNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. HausmannNebraska Supreme Court · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API