Legal Opinion
Potter v. Rain Brook Feed Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 13, 1982No. Civil S-81-34 LKKPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KARLTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Potter brings this action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained while employed by the defendant and third-party plaintiff Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. (Santa Fe). Potter suffered his injuries when a Santa Fe locomotive collided with a grain truck allegedly owned and operated by the defendants and third-party defendants Rain Brook Feed Co., Inc. and Stockton Hay & Grain, Ltd. (hereafter referred to collectively as Rain Brook). Potter seeks relief against Santa Fe under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Leland L. Lockard, Lynette Lockard v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, Rosella Ray D/B/A Rosella Ray's Boarding House. Leland L. Lockard, Lynette Lockard v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation, Rosella Ray D/B/A Rosella Ray's Boarding HouseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Sierra Club v. WattDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1985
- California Prolife Council Political Action Committee v. ScullyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1998
- Shiffler v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Sample v. BorgDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.