Legal Opinion
Banks v. IMC Kalium Carlsbad Potash Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 2003No. 27,714PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
{1} IMC Kalium Carlsbad Potash Company and Crawford & Company (“Employer”) appeal from an opinion of the Court of Appeals, see Banks v. IMC Kalium Carlsbad Potash Co., 2003-NMCA-016, ¶ 6, 133 N.M. 199, 62 P.3d 290, in which that court reversed an order granting Employer summary judgment and dismissing the claim of Carolyn Banks (“Worker”) under the Workers’ Compensation Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 52-1-1 to -70 (1929, as amended through 2003), and the Occupational Disease Disablement Law, NMSA 1978, §§ 52-3-1 to -60 (1945, as amended through 2003). Prior to entering judgment…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Dewitt v. Rent-A-Center, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Lee v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Grine v. Peabody Natural ResourcesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- Lopez v. ReddyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Bustos v. Hyundai Motor Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.