Legal Opinion
Lee v. Martinez
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided July 14, 2004No. 27,915PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Justice.
{1} Petitioners are defendants in several pending criminal eases who are seeking to have their polygraph examination results admitted into evidence under Rule 11-707(C) NMRA 2004, which states that “the opinion of a polygraph examiner may in the discretion of the trial judge be admitted as evidence as to the truthfulness of any person called as a witness,” provided certain conditions are met. In each case the State has opposed the admission of such polygraph evidence on the ground that it fails to satisfy the standard for the admissibility of expert testimony set forth…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Quynh Truong v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. DomiczSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- State v. FryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. FryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- McNeill v. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.