Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Drennon

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 2010No. 10-0226PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Per curiam

In this dispute between neighbors, we must decide whether the trial court’s judgment issued after a conventional trial on the merits was final for purposes of appeal. We conclude that it was. The Drennons’ grandchildren were joined as parties due to their shared interest in the subject property, but no claims against the grandchildren were addressed at trial nor were any jury questions submitted on the grandchildren. The grandchildren were not mentioned in the trial court’s judgment, and this raised finality concerns in the court of appeals. Under the Aldridge presumption, any judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Moritz v. PreissTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Crites v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. John v. Marshall Health Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. American Heritage Capital, LP v. Dinah Gonzalez and Alan Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  2. Good v. Baker, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
  3. Vaughn v. DrennonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. Angela Ortiz v. Dave Chapman Enterprises, LLC, and David W. Chapman, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2026
  5. Auto Mechanics Service Plus, LLC and Mohammad Al-Barnawi, Individually v. G. Michael Ragoss, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2025

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API