Moritz v. Preiss
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schneider
The trial court rendered a judgment against petitioner that did not name one of the defendants. We must decide whether the trial court’s original judgment was final. If it was, then the petitioner’s amended motion for new trial filed more than thirty days after the trial court signed the judgment was untimely. Concerned that the original judgment was not final, the court of appeals abated the appeal and remanded to the trial court to enter a final judgment that expressly disposed of all parties. 60 S.W.3d at 287. The trial court then signed a new judgment that included the originally unnamed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Jackson v. Van WinkleTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Trammell v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1913
- John v. Marshall Health Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by215 opinions
- Low v. HenryTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Waffle House, Inc. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Brookshire Grocery Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- in Re Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Viscount Properties II, L.P., D/B/A Hoy Fox toyota/lexusTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- Compass Bank v. MFP Financial Services, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
210 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.