Legal Opinion
American Heritage Capital, LP v. Dinah Gonzalez and Alan Gonzalez
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided July 1, 2014No. 05-12-00892-CVPublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice FITZGERALD.
American Heritage Capital, LP sued Alan and Dinah Gonzalez for defamation and tortious interference with prospective business relationships. AHC nonsuited its claims against Dinah. The trial judge dismissed AHC’s claims against Alan based on Alan’s motion to dismiss under the Citizens Participation Act, Chapter 27 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. The judge later awarded Alan attorneys’ fees and a $15,000 sanction. AHC appeals. Dinah cross-appeals the trial judge’s failure to hold a hearing on her motion to dismiss under Chapter 27. We affirm…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Walker v. GutierrezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Bentley v. BuntonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Loaisiga v. CerdaTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Julie Hersh v. John Tatum and Mary Ann TatumTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- Amanda Culbertson v. Pat LykosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Jane McCurley Backes D/B/A Backes Quarter Horses v. Karen Misko and Misko Quarter Horses, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- Cruz v. Van SickleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Neal Rauhauser v. James McGibney and ViaView, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2014
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.