Legal Opinion
Sanker v. Humborg
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 1, 1941No. Civ. No. 2928PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for damages suffered by plaintiff, Effie C. Sanker, widow of Rudolph H. Sanker, as a result of the death of Mr. Sanker caused by his being struck by an automobile driven by defendant.
*204The sole point urged for a reversal of the judgment is that Mr. Banker, as a matter of law, was guilty of negligence that proximately contributed to his injury and death and that the findings to the contrary are not supported by the evidence.
Commonwealth and Malden Avenues are public streets of the city of Fullerton. Commonwealth Avenue has a width of seventy-two feet between…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Salomon v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Rapp v. Southern Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Shaw v. RobertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Hall v. KaufmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Lang v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Los Angeles Finance Co. v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Lebkicher v. CrosbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Goodwin v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.