Legal Opinion

Rapp v. Southern Service Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1931No. Docket No. 348PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

A rehearing was granted' herein for the purpose of giving further consideration to the point that the action of the trial court in granting respondent’s motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the trial was justified by reason of the fact that there was no evidence of sufficient substantiality to show that, at the time of the accident which resulted in the death of decedent, the general manager of respondent, Fred E. Whyte, was acting within the scope of his employment.

The action was one instituted by the widow and minor child of Leo A. Rapp, deceased, to recover damages resulting…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  3. White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Perera v. Panama-Pacific International Exp. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Auer v. FrankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Hudgins v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Rhoda v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Martinelli v. StabnauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Phillips v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API