Legal Opinion

Sade Shoe Co. v. Oschin & Snyder

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1984No. B002159PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, P. J.

Plaintiff, Sade Shoe Company, Inc., appeals from judgment dismissing its action as to defendant Oschin and Snyder entered after the trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to the first amended complaint without leave to amend. (Code Civ. Proc., § 581, subd. 3.)

The first amended complaint sought compensatory and punitive damages for interference with prospective business advantage and interference with contractual relations. The first cause of action alleged: At all times mentioned defendant was the owner of certain premises which it leased to James and Williams Shoe…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Chicago Title Insurance v. Great Western Financial Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Herron v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Lowell v. Mother's Cake & Cookie Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Gold v. Los Angeles Democratic LeagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Bear Stearns & Co.California Supreme Court · 1990
  2. GHK Associates v. Mayer Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. First Hill Partners, LLC v. Bluecrest Capital Management Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  4. Aalgaard v. Merchants National Bank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. California Dental Ass'n v. California Dental Hygienists' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API