Legal Opinion

People v. Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 17, 2013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Leventhal, J.

This case calls upon us to address a matter of first impression involving the right to counsel under the New York Constitution (see NY Const, art I, § 6), where the defendant consented to a chemical breath test to determine her blood alcohol content (hereinafter BAG), but, prior to the commencement of the test, the police made no effort to inform the defendant that her attorney had appeared in the matter. For the reasons which follow, we hold that where, as here, the police are aware that an attorney has appeared in a case before the chemical breath test…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. People v. YuklNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. BerriosNew York Court of Appeals · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Amended September 21, 2016 State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. People v. WadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  4. State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API