People v. Berrios
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtScileppi, J.
In each of these five appeals, the defendants have been charged with possession of heroin and arresting officers have testified that glassine envelopes containing narcotics were dropped on the ground as the defendants were approached by the police. We have been called upon to decide whether, in these “ dropsy ” cases, or for that matter whenever a warrantless search is presented, it is the People who must bear the burden of proving the legality of the search and seizure. Before reaching the question presented, it is at this juncture appropriate to refer to the particular facts of each case.
In…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
3Cited by339 opinions
- People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. McRayNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. DodtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. ChappleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
334 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.