Legal Opinion

United States Steel Corp. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1984No. Appeals, Nos. 802 C.D. 1983, 803 C.D. 1983, 971 C.D. 1983, and 1068 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Williams, Jr.,

The United States Steel Corporation (petitioner) petitions for review of the rulings of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) holding that four former employees1 (claimants) had filed, valid Applications for Benefits (AB) after the termination of a preceding benefit year2 under Section 4(w) (2)3 of the Act.

The petitioner contends that the Board has misinterpreted Section 4(w)(2) in these cases and the question before us is whether, and to what extent, vacation pay can be used to satisfy the test set forth therein.

Section 4(w) (2) provides:

An…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wooley v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Claypoole v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Buss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Dickson Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coates v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Joyce v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Riley v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Alla v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API