Legal Opinion

Dickson Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1965No. Appeal, No. 117PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

Prances B. Dickson was last employed by the Bell Telephone Company in Meadville, Pennsylvania. Her final day of work was July 17, 1964, on which date she had a valid separation. Her application for unemployment compensation was disallowed by the Bureau of Employment Security, the Referee, and the Board of Review on the ground that she did not have sufficient base year earnings to be eligible for benefits under the provisions of Section 404 of the Unemployment Compensation Law. Act of December 5, 1936, P. L. (1937) 2897, 404, 43 P.S. 804. This appeal followed.

Claimant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Susquehanna Collieries Division v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Mathewson v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Zubritsky Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Kissell Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. McGuire Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Claypoole v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. United States Steel Corp. v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Dessauer v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. State, Department of Industrial Relations v. WillardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API