Legal Opinion
State v. Hamlett
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 19, 2008No. AC 27601PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Daniel W. Hamlett, Sr., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a juiy trial, of assault in the first degree as an accessory in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-59 (a) (5) and 53a-8 (a). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court (1) incorrectly denied his motion for a judgment of acquittal because there was insufficient evidence to find him liable as an accessory, (2) abused its discretion when it declined to order a mistrial and (3) improperly overruled his objection to the state’s exercise of a peremptory challenge. We affirm…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. HodgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. RespassSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. PelosoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. CollazoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. HollowayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.