Legal Opinion
Boehm v. Witte
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 6, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
95 N.J. Super. 359 (1967)
231 A.2d 240
EDWARD A. BOEHM, JR., PLAINTIFF,
v.
DR. C. NORMAN WITTE AND JOSEPH A. MELI, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided June 6, 1967.
Mr. Thomas J. Spinello and Mr. E. Bruce Wetzel, Jr. for plaintiff (Messrs. Madnick, Milstein & Mason, attorneys).
Mr. Stephen C. Carton of Carton, Nary, Witt & Arvanitis, for defendant Joseph A. Meli (Messrs. Hanlon, Argeris & Amdur, attorneys; Mr. Robert M. Hanlon, on the brief).
MUCCIFORI, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
Plaintiff Boehm was in the employ of Ernest E. Benton on September 15, 1965, on which date…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wilson v. FaullSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Bunner v. PattiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- Swartz v. ConradisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Fox v. DunningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- State v. Benjamin F. Bennett Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Eger v. E.I. Du Pont DeNemours Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Acker v. Ray Angelini, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Eger v. E.I. Du Pont DeNemours Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Eger v. E.I. Du Pont DeNemours Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988