Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eger v. E.I. Du Pont DeNemours Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 20, 1988Published

1DissentStein, J.

I agree with the majority’s preliminary observation that under the contemporary choice-of-law doctrine, “the determinative law is that of the state with the greatest interest in governing the particular issue.” Ante at 140. In my view, however, South Carolina’s interest in insulating a general contractor like Du Pont from tort liability is minimal. In comparison, New Jersey has a clear and compelling interest in providing redress, beyond the limited compensation made available through a workers’ compensation award, to the survivors of a worker whose exposure to radioactivity in South Carolina…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mellk v. SarahsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Lyon v. BarrettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Wilson v. FaullSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Dickinson v. Eastern Railroad Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  5. Boehm v. WitteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API