Legal Opinion

Swartz v. Conradis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1929No. Appeal, 108PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The sole question in this, case is whether the employee of a subcontractor can maintain a common law action of trespass against the general contractor without showing, as part of his case, that the general contractor had rejected the Compensation Act. The court below answered in the negative, and plaintiff appealed.

The general contractor was erecting a school building. He sublet the plastering contract, and plaintiff was employed by the subcontractor. He was severely injured, while engaged at his work, by the falling of a ceiling, and received compensation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gallivan v. Wark Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Byrne v. Henry A. Hitner's Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Fonner v. Shandon, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Socha v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Lewis v. School Dist. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Wilson v. FaullSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API