Legal Opinion

State v. Prickett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 13, 1995No. 93CR-2105; CA A82870PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), a class A misdemeanor. ORS 813.010. The primary issue is whether the rule announced in State v. Rudder, 133 Or App 174, 889 P2d 1367 (1995), now pending on reconsideration, applies to DUII prosecutions. We hold that it does not.

Rudder presented the question of whether district courts had retained jurisdiction over cases involving class A misdemeanors after the 1993 legislature amended ORS 161.635 to authorize a $5,000 maximum fine for class A misdemeanors, but did not amend ORS 46.040, under which the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. FishOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. TrenaryOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PrickettOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. KimseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. State v. AllbrittonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. McCainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API