Legal Opinion

State v. Nagel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1994No. DC 91-3459; CA A76823; SC S40605PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*26CARSON, C. J.

The central issue in this case is whether the administration of field sobriety tests violated defendant’s right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution, and the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

The following statement of facts is uncontroverted. In August 1991, at a time of day when headlights were required by law to be illuminated, a Lincoln County Deputy Sheriff saw defendant driving his automobile on a public road, with only one headlight illuminated. The officer turned his automobile…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Hulse v. State, Department of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. FerreiraIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. State v. FishOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. BlaisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. State v. MeharryOregon Supreme Court · 2006

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API