State v. Prickett
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
This is a criminal case in which defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). The issue before us is whether questioning that occurs after the completion by a defendant of lawful field sobriety tests is “compelling,” as a matter of law, under Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution, thereby requiring that such questioning always be preceded by Miranda-like warnings. We answer that question “no.”
On October 1, 1993, at about 10:30 p.m., an Oregon State Police trooper stopped defendant’s car for two traffic infractions: failure to have a license plate…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. Roble-BakerOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. ShaffOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. WerowinskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.