Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Hoge

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1890No. 13742PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Alternative writ of mandate to Hon. J. P. Hoge, judge of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.

To an alternative writ of mandate issued out of this court commanding respondent to show cause, if any he may have, why he has failed, neglected, and refused, and still neglects and refuses, to allow, settle, certify, and sign the bill of exceptions, or other proper bill of exceptions, in the petition of the petitioners mentioned, the respondent has filed his answer, in which he denies that he has refused to sign or certify a correct bill of exceptions in the cause mentioned in said petition, and alleges that he has settled, certified, and filed a correct bill.of exceptions in said cause.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bruce v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Priddy v. GibsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  3. George v. BeatyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. State ex rel. Dimond Bros. v. CraigWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Fuhrman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API