Legal Opinion

George v. Beaty

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 1927No. Docket No. 5777PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

In this original proceeding in mandamus the petitioners seek the peremptory writ compelling the respondents, as the board of supervisors of the Los Angeles Flood Control District, to proceed to construct a dam at the San Gabriel Canyon dam site of the height of 425 feet above the bed of the stream with a storage capacity of 240,000 acre-feet of water, or to construct to completion a dam of such height and capacity as can be constructed for the sum of $25,000,000. It is made to appear by the allegations of the petition that at a special election called for that purpose on May 24, 1924, the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. BoutwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. County of Calaveras v. BrockwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. State ex rel. Piper v. GraceyNevada Supreme Court · 1876
  4. People ex rel. National Cigar Co. v. DulaneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  5. People ex rel. Hemstreet v. CrabbIllinois Supreme Court · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bruce v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. W. R. Grace & Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State Board of Education v. HonigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Morris v. HarperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Cooke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API