State ex rel. Dimond Bros. v. Craig
Wyoming Supreme Court
Original proceeding in mandamus brought in the name of the State on the relation of Dimond Brothers, a partnership, against David H. Craig, as District Judge, to compel the settlement and signing of a proposed bill of exceptions. The case was heard upon demurrer to the answer. The facts are stated in the opinion. The principal errors complained of as having occurred upon the trial of the cause in question arose upon objections to testimony.
Read the full summary
Original proceeding in mandamus brought in the name of the State on the relation of Dimond Brothers, a partnership, against David H. Craig, as District Judge, to compel the settlement and signing of a proposed bill of exceptions. The case was heard upon demurrer to the answer. The facts are stated in the opinion. The principal errors complained of as having occurred upon the trial of the cause in question arose upon objections to testimony. The exceptions as to those matters are stated in the proposed bill by showing the questions objected to and the answers thereto. Counsel’s affidavit as to…
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, Justice.
This is a proceeding in mandamus, originally commenced in this court. From the pleadings it appears that the relator, a copartnership, was sued and judgment recovered against it in the District Court of Sweetwater County by Beckwith, Quinn & Company, a corporation. The cause was tried to a jury on October 28 and 29, 1904. The relator moved for a new trial. The motion was overruled and, upon request, time was allowed the relator within which to reduce its exceptions to writing and present them for allowance. *443Though it is alleged in the petition that the defendant refused to sign…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People ex rel. Hubbard v. AnthonyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Callahan v. HouckWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
- Conway v. Smith Mercantile Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1896
- Jelley v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Sansome v. MyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Walliker v. EscottWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Fried v. GuibersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Mulhern v. MahsWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
- McCague Investment Co. v. MallinWyoming Supreme Court · 1915
- Rollins v. DuncombeWyoming Supreme Court · 1916