Legal Opinion

Fuhrman v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1935No. S. F. 15189PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate directed to the respondent court directing and commanding it to settle a bill of exceptions. The case of Beasley v. Fuhrman came to trial in the superior court upon the complaint and answer thereto, the cross-complaint of petitioner and an answer thereto, and judgment was rendered for defendant upon the complaint and answer and for cross-defendant in the cross-action. Cross-complainant, the petitioner here, gave notice of appeal from that part of the judgment rendered against' him and in due time served and presented to the trial judge his proposed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Thornton v. HogeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lind v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Neblett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Silvagni v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Breedlove v. BreedloveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API