Legal Opinion
United States v. Dansker
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 14, 1978No. 78-1370PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
The principal issue presented for decision requires us to construe the 120-day time limitation of Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 in a convoluted criminal proceeding in which a motion for a new trial was filed in the district court after appellant Joseph Diaco had exhausted a direct appeal from his conviction. The post-appeal new trial motion was grounded upon newly discovered evidence. After exhausting his appeal from the denial of that motion, he moved for reduction of sentence; the district court held that because the motion was unseasonably filed under Rule…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. David Friedland, David J. Friedland, in No. 95-5582. David Friedland v. Douglas Lansing, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Ft. Dix, Nj United States Parole Commission David J. Friedland, in No. 95-5583. David Friedland v. United States of America, David J. Friedland, InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. BazzanoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Alfred B. Diggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Greco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- United States v. FerriCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.