Legal Opinion

Alfred B. Diggs v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 26, 1984No. 83-3143PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER, Circuit Judge.

Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) gives a district court the power to reduce a sentence it previously imposed upon a crim*241inal defendant; the rule also states, generally speaking, that this reduction must take place, if at all, within 120 days of a final decision upholding the conviction. In the case before us, which is an appeal from a district court denial of a motion for collateral relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the district court, after waiting two and a half years, granted prisoner Alfred Diggs’ rule 35(b) motion, and then reversed itself,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. HeadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. William Junior Hughes v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. James A. EssigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Alvin SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Greco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API