Alfred B. Diggs v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) gives a district court the power to reduce a sentence it previously imposed upon a crim*241inal defendant; the rule also states, generally speaking, that this reduction must take place, if at all, within 120 days of a final decision upholding the conviction. In the case before us, which is an appeal from a district court denial of a motion for collateral relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the district court, after waiting two and a half years, granted prisoner Alfred Diggs’ rule 35(b) motion, and then reversed itself,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- State v. HeadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- William Junior Hughes v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. James A. EssigCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Alvin SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Greco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.