Legal Opinion
State v. Nesmith
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 17, 1991No. 14257PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
After a jury trial, the defendant appealed to the Appellate Court from a judgment of conviction of possession of narcotics in violation of General Stat*629utes § 21a-279 (a).1 On appeal, he claimed that the trial court improperly refused to instruct the jury as to the doctrine of nonexclusive possession of the premises. The Appellate Court concluded that “the instructions as given were accurate and consistent with the evidence, and that the trial court was correct in refusing to give the requested charge.” State v. Nesmith, 24 Conn. App. 158, 163, 586 A.2d 628 (1991). We granted certification…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. AlfonsoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- William Evans and Josephine Evans v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. JarrettConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Goodrum v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.