Legal Opinion
State v. Jarrett
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 20, 2004No. AC 23506PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The defendant, Daniel Jarrett, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a juiy trial, of possession of four ounces or more of a cannabis-type substance in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (b), criminal possession of a pistol or revolver in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217c and possession of a sawed-off shotgun in violation of General Statutes § 53a-211. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) instructed the jury on constructive possession, (2) instructed the jury on his presumption of innocence and (3) admitted into evidence…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. MarsalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. SargentConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. MartinezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. Bennett-GibsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. SerranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.