Legal Opinion
Sandlin v. Pearsall
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided November 17, 1976No. CIV-4-75-46PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
This is an action for monetary damages for deprivation of the plaintiff’s civil rights. She claimed that she suffered serious damage to her eyesight from the use by the defendants Messrs. Rowland and Mathias upon her person, while she was in custody after an arrest, of unreasonable force, and that they failed to provide her with timely medical attention when she was in obvious need thereof. The jury found for the de fendants, and the plaintiff moved timely for a new trial. Rules 59(a)(1), (2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The gravamen of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Dan Lind v. Schenley Industries IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. MoylanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- James D. Arms v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Rosera v. International Harvester Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1986
- Madewell v. GarmonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
- Rogers v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- St. Clair v. PipalDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.