Legal Opinion

Madewell v. Garmon

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided February 13, 1980No. CIV-4-79-30PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

The defendant sheriff moved the Court for a summary judgment, Rule 56(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, contending that he is protected from any liability herein by the provisions of T.C.A. § 8-832. * The motion lacks merit.

“ * * * Although T.C.A. § 8-832 does not immunize a Tennessee sheriff * * * from actions by a sheriff, himself, in violation of the federal civil rights statutes, Moore, v. Buckles, D.C.Tenn. (1975), 404 F.Supp. 1382, 1383[1], the doctrine of respondeat superior does not apply where monetary damages are sought against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Larry T. Wilson v. Thomas L. BeebeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  2. Moore v. BucklesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1975
  3. Sandlin v. PearsallDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1976
  4. Fults v. PearsallDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bradford v. GardnerDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1984
  2. Smith v. JordanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
  3. Burt v. Hamilton CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API