Montgomery v. Airbus Helicopters, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, J.:
¶1 We granted certiorari to address whether the defendants/appellees whose products were used to make an ambulance helicopter had sufficient minimum contacts with the State of Oklahoma in order to establish personal jurisdiction over them after the helicopter crashed in Oklahoma, killing two Oklahoma residents. We hold that they do not.
FACTS
¶2 This cause arises from an ambulance helicopter crash (accident helicopter), on February 22, 2013, shortly after takeoff in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The pilot, Mark *826Montgomery (pilot), and his crew, responded to an emergency medical transport…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- First v. Rolling Plains ImplementCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
- GALIER v. MURCO WALL PRODUCTSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- LIFETOUCH NATIONAL SCHOOL STUDIOS v. OKLAHOMA SCHOOL PICTURESCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2023
- B&B Texas Equipment LLC v. MckeeDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023
- BARFELL v. FREEMAN HEALTH SYSTEM AND GULSHAN UPPAL, M.D.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.