Legal Opinion

Pilkington v. Fausone

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 1970No. Civ. 1168PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COAKLEY, J.

This quiet title action presents the question of ownership of an alley, 20 feet wide. The court decreed ownership of the westerly 10 feet of the alley in the respondents and the easterly 10 feet in appellant. Appellant contends he owns the entire 20 feet.

The facts are not in dispute and there is no issue of credibility of witnesses. The solution lies in the interpretation of documentary evidence, chiefly deeds, and in applicable statutes. Accordingly, the question is one of law, which, as an appellate court, we must resolve independently of the trial court’s determination.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Anderson v. Citizens Sav. & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Los Angeles City High School District v. SwensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. MacHado v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  5. City of Redlands v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baker v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Besneatte v. GourdinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Parr v. WorleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API