Parr v. Worley
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASLEY, Justice.
Parr sued Worley to quiet title to the mineral interest in land occupied by a public highway. Worley counterclaimed to quiet title in himself. The court granted summary judgment for Parr. We reverse.
The questions are whether a deed convey- . ing land “lying to the East of” the highway includes the east one-half of the highway and whether a designation of the acreage is controlling in determining the intent of the grantor.
In 1949, Parr conveyed to Worley a portion of land described as “lying to the East of” the highway, “containing 25 acres, more or less.” The actual…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marks v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Moody v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Stuart v. FoxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
- Askins v. British-American Oil Producing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Nickson v. GarryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burnham v. City of FarmingtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State ex rel. State Highway Department v. Hidalgo Area Development Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Ettinger v. Oyster Bay II Cmty. Prop. Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018