Legal Opinion

Parr v. Worley

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1979No. 12090PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASLEY, Justice.

Parr sued Worley to quiet title to the mineral interest in land occupied by a public highway. Worley counterclaimed to quiet title in himself. The court granted summary judgment for Parr. We reverse.

The questions are whether a deed convey- . ing land “lying to the East of” the highway includes the east one-half of the highway and whether a designation of the acreage is controlling in determining the intent of the grantor.

In 1949, Parr conveyed to Worley a portion of land described as “lying to the East of” the highway, “containing 25 acres, more or less.” The actual…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Marks v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Moody v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Stuart v. FoxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
  4. Askins v. British-American Oil Producing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Nickson v. GarryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burnham v. City of FarmingtonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State ex rel. State Highway Department v. Hidalgo Area Development Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ettinger v. Oyster Bay II Cmty. Prop. Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API