Wilkerson v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.
We granted a petition and conditional cross-petition for writ of certiorari to consider application of the Supreme Court’s 2004 decision in Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600, 124 S.Ct. 2601, 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004), which dealt with “two-step” or “question-first” interrogation tactics, to the circumstances of this case. See generally Eric English, You Ham the Right to Remain Silent. Now Please Repeat Your Confession: Missouri v. Seibert and the Court’s Attempt to Put an End to the Question-First Technique, 33 Pepp. L.Rev. 423 (2006). Regrettably, we are unable on this record to confront…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Derr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Norton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Quinones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Makowski v. Mayor and City of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.