Legal Opinion

Makowski v. Mayor and City of Baltimore

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 24, 2014No. 81/13PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

This case involves a “quick-take” condemnation 1 of a property located at 900-902 N. Chester Street, comprised of a building that had formerly housed a church and contained various offices. The Appellant, Edward Makowski, raises ten issues for our review, 2 some of which are not properly before us, and the rest of which can be addressed as a single question:

Did the Circuit Court for Baltimore City err in granting the City’s “Petition for Immediate Possession and Title” to 900-902 N. Chester Street?

We shall answer no, affirm, and explain.

We derive the following facts from the memorandum…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Cottonwood Christian Center v. Cypress Redevelopment AgencyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  4. Coleman v. Anne Arundel County Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Riden v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington R. R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rocky Mountain Exploration, Inc. v. Davis Graham & Stubbs LLPSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  2. Sublet, Harris & Monge-Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API