Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Nooth

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 18, 2018No. A159870PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

*840Petitioner appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. In response, defendant, the superintendent of the Snake River Correctional Institution, asserts that ORS 138.525(3) bars this appeal because, in the superintendent's view, the post-conviction court dismissed the petition as "meritless" within the meaning of that provision. See ORS 138.525(3) ("Notwithstanding ORS 138.650, a judgment dismissing a meritless petition is not appealable."). Because the judgment and the record are not clear as to the basis of the court's dismissal, and because our appellate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Young v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Breece v. AmsberryUmatilla County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. Corona v. AmsberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dawson v. KellyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API