Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Kelly

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 4, 2023No. 6:20-cv-00698Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PAUL DAWSON, Case No. 6:20-cv-00698-IM Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. BRANDON KELLY, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent. IMMERGUT, District Judge. Petitioner Paul Dawson (“Petitioner”), an individual in custody at Oregon State Penitentiary, filed this habeas corpus proceeding pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

(“Section 2254”). Because Petitioner’s habeas petition is barred by the applicable one-year statute of limitations, and because there is no basis for statutory or equitable tolling such that the petition may be…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Sergey Spitsyn v. Robert Moore, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Michael Allen Bowen v. Ernest Roe, Warden California State Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API