Legal Opinion

People v. Ford

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 30, 1948No. Crim. 4260PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Defendant was accused of grand theft and was1 convicted in a jury trial of taking a small purse and jewelry of the value of $1,750 from the home of a Mrs. Floyd. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for new trial.

The points on appeal are that there was insufficient proof of the corpus delicti to allow the admission in evidence of defendant’s confession, and that the court erred in giving erroneous and conflicting instructions. The record also discloses certain statements made to the jury by the prosecutor which require examination for the purpose of determining…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. People v. EdgarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. People v. DuvernayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. People v. AngelopoulusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. KirkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. People v. TalleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API