People v. Fleming
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Bush & Hall, Henley C. Booth, A. A. Moore, and Stanley Moore, for Appellant. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, J. Charles Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, and Orr M. Chenoweth, District Attorney, for Respondent.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The appellant was charged with murder and convicted of manslaughter. He appeals from the judgment pronounced upon such conviction, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
It is earnestly contended that the verdict is contrary to the evidence. It must be conceded by any fair minded person who reads the voluminous record on appeal, consisting of over four thousand pages, that even if there be sufficient evidence to legally sustain the verdict, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. O'BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. DerwaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. MohrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. ArlingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. WeldonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
3Cited by77 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.