Legal Opinion

People v. Duvernay

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1941No. Crim. 3434PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

An information filed by the district attorney of Los Angeles County charged the defendant with the crime of violation of section 11036 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, which section limits and regulates, among other things, the right to sell, furnish, give away or transport narcotics. Following trial before a jury, the defendant was found guilty. This appeal is from the judgment.

Because appellant bases his grounds for reversal upon claimed misconduct of the district attorney and errors of the trial court in the admission of evidence, it becomes necessary to epitomize…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. People v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. SarazzawskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Grudt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. TalleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API