Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re the Appeal of the Crow Wing County Attorney

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 13, 1996No. C9-95-2527PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

County board appeals the trial court’s ruling that the board arbitrarily and capriciously set the county attorney’s 1993 budget by disregarding both the responsibilities and duties of the office and the experience, qualifications, and performance of the assistant county attorneys. We affirm.

FACTS

While he was Crow Wing County Attorney, John Remington Graham attempted to obtain wage increases for his assistant county attorneys. Seeking to overturn salary decisions of appellant Crow Wing County Board (the board), the county attorney first appealed the 1992 budget under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Stensland v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. In Re Mille Lacs Co. Atty. SalaryCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kmart Corp. v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Bradley v. First Nat. Bank of Walker, N.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Rasmussen v. SauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Correll v. Distinctive Dental Services, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Kmart Corp. v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API